Arpaio shocked by comedian's profanity
JUST
LAST WEEK MORE NARCOMEX TUNNELS WERE DISCOVERED UNDER THE AX BORDER! YOU WON’T
READ ABOUT THAT IN THE LA RAZA PRESS of the NEW YORK TIMES!!!
ARIZONA
IS UNDER ASSAULT BY MEXICO AND OBAMA’S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION!
WHILE
OBAMA’S CORRUPT HOLDER DEPT of JUSTICE HAS NEVER PROSECUTED ANY OF OBAMA’S
CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, DOJ IS ENDLESSLY HARASSING LEGALS IN AZ WITH LAWSUITS
TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY, TO SABOTAGE AZ’S ATTEMPT TO PROTECT THEIR BORDERS AGAINST
THE MEX INVASION AND OCCUPATION AND TO PREVENT ILLEGALS FROM VOTING!
LEGALS
IN AZ ARE FORCED TO PAY OUT MILLIONS IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. NOT ONE LEGAL
VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY LA RAZA!
TALK
ABOUT “TERRORISM”…. THE BIGGEST TERRORIST THREAT THIS NATION FACES HOPS OUR
BORDER DAILY TO LOOT, RAPE, MOLEST CHILDREN, STEAL, AND COMMIT ANY CRIME THEY
CAN… THEY ARE THE MEXICANS!
NEXT
TO MEXICO CITY, PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEX KIDNAPPING.
PHOENIX
IS THE LARGEST CENTER FOR MEX CAR THEFT.
PHOENIX
IS THE LARGEST CENTER FOR VIOLENT HOME INVASION!
LOOK
AT MEXIFORNIA, NOW LA RAZA-OCCUPIED! ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS
(LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS), NEARLY HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!
HALF THE PRISON POPULATION OF THAT LA RAZA INFESTED STATE ARE MEXICANS.
IN
LOS ANGELES, THE MEX WELFARE CAPITAL, OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, 183
ARE MEXICANS, AND MOST OF THE REST RUSSIANS!
LOS
ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS… NOT ONE
LEGAL VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY LA RAZA!
COPS
MAKE MISTAKES ALL THE TIME! THEY KNOW THAT ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST INDUSTRIES
IN OUR BORDERS NEXT TO DRUGS IS THE MANUFACTURING OF FRAUD DOCS!
“One plaintiff, Manuel de Jesus Ortega
Melendres, is a Mexican citizen who had a valid visa when Sheriff Arpaio’s
deputies arrested him in 2007. He said he was handcuffed and held for hours,
not read his rights or allowed a phone call, or told why he had been arrested.
Two other plaintiffs, Velia Meraz and Manuel Nieto, were accosted by deputies
at gunpoint during a neighborhood sweep, for no explained reason. They are
citizens.”
FROM
MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES – MOUTHPIECE FOR THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA’S PROGANDA!
July 15, 2012
Sheriff Joe on Trial
Five years after he started “crime suppression”
sweeps that terrorized Latino neighborhoods across Maricopa County, Arizona,
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is finally having to explain himself. Not to TV crews in
Phoenix or to fawning hosts on Fox News, but before a federal judge.
The trial in Melendres v. Arpaio, a class-action
civil-rights lawsuit, is scheduled to begin Thursday in Federal District Court
in Phoenix. The plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union
and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, accuse the sheriff
of waging an all-out, unlawful campaign of discrimination and harassment
against Latinos and those who look like them.
They say the sheriff and his deputies — aided by
ad hoc civilian “posses,” anonymous phone tipsters, even motorcycle gangs —
made illegal stops, searches and arrests, staged wrongful neighborhood and
workplace raids, and provoked widespread fear among citizens, legal residents
and undocumented immigrants alike.
One plaintiff, Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres,
is a Mexican citizen who had a valid visa when Sheriff Arpaio’s deputies
arrested him in 2007. He said he was handcuffed and held for hours, not read
his rights or allowed a phone call, or told why he had been arrested. Two other
plaintiffs, Velia Meraz and Manuel Nieto, were accosted by deputies at gunpoint
during a neighborhood sweep, for no explained reason. They are citizens.
The outrages to be presented to the court can be
added to a long list of abuses going back years, on the streets of Maricopa and
in the sheriff’s jails. As early as 2008, The East Valley Tribune of Mesa, a
city outside Phoenix, published a series of articles examining the immigration
raids as a law-enforcement disaster. While deputies scoured the county making
baseless immigration arrests, they neglected other duties, racking up millions
of dollars in overtime and showing up ever later to emergencies while the
number of criminal arrests and prosecutions plummeted.
Despite those results, Sheriff Arpaio kept
going. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano could have condemned his
actions years ago and refused to work with him. But instead, he was allowed to
continue the abuse, even as his squad of immigration enforcers deputized under
the federal 287(g) program grew to 160, by far the country’s largest. The
sheriff became a right-wing celebrity, courted by politicians eager to win the
anti-immigrant vote. One of these was Mitt Romney, who accepted his endorsement
for president in 2008.
This case is only the first of what is likely to
be a string of civil rights challenges against immigration actions in Arizona.
A civil lawsuit, brought by the Justice Department, accusing Sheriff Arpaio of
systematic and widespread civil rights abuses, is moving through the courts.
Last month, the United States Supreme Court
declined to overturn the section of
Arizona’s immigration law that
requires local officers to check the papers of suspected illegal immigrants.
But it said the provision could be challenged on equal-protection grounds, if
there is evidence of racial profiling in the way it is carried out. The trial
this week does not deal with police conduct under that law, but it does suggest
that racial profiling is a deep-seated problem, certainly in Maricopa County.
Sheriff Arpaio is facing the voters for a sixth
term this fall. He has long insisted that he answers to no one but the county’s
residents, who keep re-electing him. If voters won’t put an end to his abuses,
the courts and the Constitution will have the final word.
California spending annually $22 billion to support illegals
Going To the Top!
By Susan Tully
I've been at the immigration reform and enforcement
table for about 20 years. I've worked with activists during all those years.
But last week, in Los Angeles, I had a first-time-ever experience at an
activist brain storming session.
Gathered for an update on Stop AB131, the petition
drive to gather signatures to force a ballot initiative as to whether the
California taxpayers should fund college grants to illegal aliens, I asked the
top activist leaders from Southern California how the signature drive was
going.
They started updating me with the positive response
from California residents who signed the petitions, but then admitted about
500,000 more signatures were still needed. When I said there was only a little
more than three weeks to go to meet the January 5th deadline, suddenly their
faces dropped at once, and the room went completely silent.
It was easy to read on each of their faces; the
task was nearly impossible! Without big money to pay signature gatherers or a
tsunami of petitions flooding in, the taxpayers of California will be forced to
give grant money to illegal aliens for college, on top of the $22 billion they
are spending annually in California to support the illegal alien population.
While all of our minds were racing and searching
for suggestions as to how to accomplish this daunting task of gathering
signatures, Lupe Moreno, long time Hispanic leader from Santa Ana, said
"Can we have a prayer?" Everyone agreed to pray.
As the prayer went around the table, people expressed
their sorrow for the lack of leadership in the State of California and in the
nation to protect the interest of American citizens, and asked for divine
guidance in helping them understand the harm their policies are inflicting on
millions of innocent people in the state. In all the years I have worked on
this issue, I had not witnessed the sort of sincere emotion that was expressed
in that room.
(THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY
IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! AND WE ARE FORCED TO FUND
IT!)
You see, the
politicians in California are happy to give money the state doesn't have to
illegal aliens to attend college, while they cut the budgets and slash programs
for public safety, right and left. The American citizen's interests and safety
are simply collateral damage for seeking and appealing to the illegal alien
lobby.
These activists in California have already learned
what the rest of the nation is about to learn. We the people. . . are the only
ones looking out for the best interest of American citizens. With few
exceptions, we have no national leadership on the issue of stopping the illegal
migration flow into our nation.
American citizenship or the benefits thereof have
become a commodity for politicians to pander and barter away. They will grant
de facto citizenship through sanctuary policies, in-state tuition,
non-compliance with Secure Communities, grants for college, etc., etc., etc.
President Obama and most the Republican presidential hopefuls are peddling
various versions of amnesty proposals if they are elected next year.
What do these politicians want in return? They are
hoping to leverage enough votes in key states to put them over the top in 2012,
no matter what it costs the American people. This is futures betting: The
politicians are gambling the nation's future in hopes of winning the next
election.
So while the
state can't afford to pay its bills or provide decent services to citizens,
these California activists watch their elected leaders lavish still more
benefits for people who don't have a legal right to be in the country. And
while their child might have to pay out-of-state tuition to go to college in
another state, thousands of illegal aliens are going to college at in-state
tuition rates in California that they are subsidizing.
In addition
they know that millions of other illegal alien parents are receiving food
stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance and dozens of other state and local
benefits for their American-born children, while they have to decide which
bills will be paid this month and which will have to wait.
It's not hard to understand why the activist of
California need all the help they can get. Please go to www.stopAB131.com and
lend a hand to our friends and family and the people of California to do what
needs to be done for the good of our children first.
*
LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE “DREAM ACT” LIFE FOR LA RAZA OFF THE AMERICANS BACK!
NOT ONE AMERICAN VOTED FOR ONE DREAM ACT HANDOUT!
*
THE ILLEGAL (MEXICAN) CRIME TIDAL WAVE:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/heather-mac-donald-illegal-alien-crime.html
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA
ARE BY MEX GANGS!
THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED
BACK OVER THE BORDER TO MEXICO TO AVOID PROSECUTION!
YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY AND MORE OPEN BORDERS???
*
CA HAS THE MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY. HALF
THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS NEARLY HALF
OF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
OF HER OWN TOP MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, ALL ARE MEXICANS!
OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN LOS ANGELES, 176 ARE
MEXICANS. MOST OF THE REMAINING ARE RUSSIANS!
*
TEN MOST WANTED
CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER OF MEX GANG
MEMBERS EXCEEDS ONE MILLION!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
And there are some 800,000
gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in
our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to
import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert
joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why
he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug
gangs.
*
*
“What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
TEN MOST WANTED
CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
*
“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll
declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2]
Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured
the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are
harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In
fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the
illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually
strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”
*
ARIZONA IS A STATE UNDER OBAMA’S DEPT. of JUSTICE ASSAULT. ALONG WITH
THREE OTHER AMERICAN STATES, OBAMA HAS SHOVED HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA OF
OPEN BORDERS, SANCTUARY CITIES, DREAM ACTS, NO E-VERIFY, NO I.D. TO
INCONVENIENCE ILLEGALS VOTING!
WHILE OBAMA HAS STATIONED 2,500 TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA, HE HAS REPEATEDLY
SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND ASSURE THE MEX DRUG CARTELS THAT MEX
TRUCK DRIVERS COULD ENTER OUR BORDERS WITH THEIR HUMAN CARGO AND DRUGS,
SOMETHING WHICH BUSH PROHIBITED.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIALWATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE
NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
*
Pinal County Sheriff: Mexican drug cartels now control
parts of Arizona
Posted: 06/11/2010
CASA GRANDE, AZ - Two
men shot earlier this week could be the result of the ongoing battle between
Mexican drug cartels now spilling over deep into Arizona, officials say.
Pinal County
investigators say an area known as the smuggling corridor now
stretches from Mexico's border to metro Phoenix.
The area , once an
area for family hiking and off road vehicles has government signs warning
residents of the drug and human smugglers.
Night vision cameras have photographed
military armed cartel members delivering drugs to vehicles along Highway 8.
"We are three
counties deep. How is it that you see pictures like these, not American with
semi and fully automatic rifles. How is that okay?" asked Pinal County
Sheriff Paul Babeu.
Babeu said he no
longer has control over parts of his county.
"We are
outgunned, we are out manned and we don't have the resources here locally to
fight this," he said at a Friday news conference.
Five weeks ago Deputy
Louie Puroll was ambushed and shot as he tracked six drug smugglers.
Sheriff Babeu said
the ambush mirrored military tactics.
Even more disturbing,
Babeu said the man who called in to 911 operators for help seemed to know a lot
about the sheriff deputy's case.
"He told
operators they could find him where the deputy was shot and talked about our
search helicopter. Things that were talked about on the news," Babeu said.
When operators asked
the fatally wounded man how he knew the area, he claimed he sold cantelope near
mile post 150.
Both men were found
dead several hours later.
Detectives say next
to them was a Bushmaster automatic rifle used by police officers for patrolling.
It does not appear to be stolen.
Investigators also
revealed that an autopsy showed strap marks on one of the men that likely came
from hauling heavy loads, they suspect were drugs.
One of the men,
deputies say, was voluntarily deported seven times.
Babeu said he doesn't believe the drug
cartel problems will not be solved when SB 1070 becomes a law, or with
President Obama's promise of 1,200 troops spread out among four border states.
"It will fall
short. What is truly needed in 3,000 soldiers for Arizona alone," Babeu
said.
*
KEEP THIS IN MIND AS YOU WITNESS OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA
HISPANDERING ADMINISTRATION’S ENDLESS ASSAULT ON THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA FOR MORE
“CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS, KNOWN TO HIM AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”.
Gov. Brewer: Most border-crossers are drug
'mules' for Mexican cartels
Expanding
on comments made at a candidates' debate, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said today
she believes that most illegal immigrants crossing the border are
"mules" carrying drugs for Mexican cartels.
"I
believe today, under the circumstances that we're facing, that the majority of
the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of Arizona are under the
direction and control of organized drug cartels and they are bringing drugs
in,"
Brewer told the Associated Press.
"There's
strong information to us that they come as illegal people wanting to come to
work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects of the drug cartel,"
she said.
During
the June 15 Republican debate she said she believed that most illegal
immigrants did not enter the United States for work. She then associated
illegal immigrants with drug smuggling, drop houses, extortion and other
criminal activity, according to AP.
The state
law she signed making it a crime to be in Arizona illegally will take effect
next month.
*
By Dennis Wagner, The Arizona Republic
On May 9, a 15-year-old girl walked
into
Arizona through the San Luis port of entry,
near Yuma, with 5 pounds of marijuana strapped around her belly, Customs and
Border Protection records show.
She was
busted by customs officers.
Later
that day, a 16-year-old boy tried the same thing with 2 pounds of cannabis
taped to his legs. He, too, was arrested.
The
marijuana, with a combined street value of $72,000, was confiscated.
The
juveniles — both U.S. citizens — were turned over to police, but others keep
taking their place.
In the
past two years, Homeland Security officials have witnessed a disturbing
development along the Mexican border: kid smugglers.
"It's
going up," said Michael Lowrie, a public-affairs agent for the
U.S. Border Patrol. "Not a whole lot,
but more than we've seen in, well, pretty much ever."
The Border Patrol does not keep data on
juvenile drug runners caught trying to sneak into Arizona. Customs and Border
Protection records show 130 minors were caught attempting to bring drugs
through entry ports from Sonora into Arizona during fiscal
2009, an 83% increase over the previous year.
Teresa
Small, a Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman in San Luis, said narcotics
organizations are recruiting American teens with claims that they won't face
major punishment if caught.
"Drug-trafficking
organizations lead them to believe they will not have a substantial
sentence," Small said. Prison terms are not uncommon for teen smugglers.
The
problem escalated last year to a point where federal and local authorities
created programs to warn Yuma County students about the dangers and
consequences of drug smuggling. The federal campaign includes a presentation by
border agents.
Judge
Maria Elena Cruz said she has noticed a surge of young smugglers who are
stunned when she orders them incarcerated.
Small
said most of the youthful offenders are Americans with family members in
Mexico. She said port officers generally refer suspects to local authorities
for prosecution under Arizona law, rather than to the federal justice system.
"One
thing for sure: They will get the hardest punishment possible," Small
said.
Still,
the cases pile up.
On June
24, Customs and Border Protection reported, a 16-year-old American boy was
arrested at the San Luis port of entry with cocaine taped to his leg.
"They
think they're going to get away with it or get a slap on the wrist,"
Lowrie
*
“PHOENIX – Federal
authorities said Wednesday they plan to sue an Arizona county sheriff and his
office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Hispanics.”
Justice Department planning to sue
Arizona sheriff Arpaio over alleged racial profiling
Published May
10, 2012
|
Associated Press
advertisement
PHOENIX – Federal
authorities said Wednesday they plan to sue an Arizona county sheriff and his
office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial
profiling of Hispanics.
The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement
requiring sheriff Joe Arpaio office to train officers in how to make
constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops
and reach out to Hispanics to assure them that the department is there to also
protect them.
Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed
that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have
to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.
DOJ officials told a lawyer for Arpaio on April 3 that the
lawman's refusal of a court-appointed monitor was a deal-breaker that would end
settlement negotiations and result in a federal lawsuit.
The "notice of intent to file civil action" came
Wednesday from Assistant U.S. Attorney General Thomas Perez in a letter to an
Arpaio lawyer.
Perez, who heads the DOJ's civil rights division, noted that it's
been more than 100 days since the sheriff's office received the DOJ's findings
report and federal authorities haven't met with the Maricopa County Sheriff's
Office counsel since Feb. 6 to discuss the terms of a consent agreement.
At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, Arpaio defended himself
in the face of the pending lawsuit.
"If they sue, we'll go to court. And then we'll find out the
real story," he said. "There's lots of miscommunication emanating
from Washington. They broke off communications.
"They're telling me how to run my organization. I'd like to
get this resolved, but I'm not going to give up my authority to the federal
government. It's as simple as that," Arpaio added.
Last December, the DOJ released a scathing report accusing
Arpaio's office of racially profiling Latinos, basing immigration enforcement
on racially charged citizen complaints and punishing Hispanic jail inmates for
speaking Spanish in Arizona's most populous county.
The DOJ also accused Arpaio of having a culture of disregard for
basic constitutional rights.
The civil rights allegations have led some Arpaio critics to call
for his resignation, including the National Council of La Raza, a prominent
advocacy group for Latinos.
The sheriff's office also is facing criticism over more than 400
sex-crimes investigations -- including dozens of alleged child molestations --
that hadn't been investigated adequately or weren't examined at all over a
three-year period ending in 2007.
Arpaio has apologized for the botched cases, reopened 432
sex-crimes investigations and made 19 arrests.
Separate from the civil rights probe, a federal grand jury has
been investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations since
at least December 2009. That grand jury is examining the investigative work of
the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad.
The self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America has been a national
political fixture who has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and
dressing them in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough
on crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront
illegal immigration.
*
“PHOENIX – The state senator in Arizona who wrote the nation's toughest law
against
illegal immigrants said Tuesday he's collecting support across the country
from
legislators to challenge automatic U.S. citizenship to the children of
illegal
immigrants.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/anchor-babies-arizona-fights-la-raza.html
*
ANOTHER
NARCOMEX TUNNEL FOUND ALONG OBAMA’S OPEN AND UNDEFENDED AZ BORDERS!
PLEASE EMAIL THIS
BLOG POSTING TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS! YOUR STATE IS NEXT TO FALL TO MEXICO!
WILL ARIZONA
BECOME THE NEXT LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXICAN WELFARE STATE LIKE CA?
WILL MEXICO
BANKRUPT AMERICA LIKE IT HAS CA?
OBAMA
HAS ALWAYS PUSHED TO PUT ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS. HIS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS A
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST!
OBAMA
SUED THE STATE of ARIZONA TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY, WHICH WOULD EFFECTIVELY END
ILLEGALS GETTING OUR JOBS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
DEMS
ARE THE PARTY of ILLEGALS.
IN
MEX-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA – THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE, THE LA RAZA FACTION
(illegals) of the CA STATE LEGISLATURE, PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR
EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY. LA RAZA DEM JERRY BROWN COULDN’T SIGN IT FAST
ENOUGH!
LA
RAZA SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY
MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLAR WAR PROFITEER’S MANSION.
LA
RAZA NANCY PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY. SHE’S
VOWED THE WALL WILL NEVER BE BUILT.
SEN.
BARBARA BOXER, and REID OF LA RAZA-OCCUPIED NEVADA WERE BOTH REELECTED ON
OBAMA’S PLATFORM OF OPEN BORDERS, NO REAL WALL, NO E-VERIFY, GRINGO-PAID DREAM
ACTS, MUCHO WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS AND AMNESTY, or at least CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT.
LOOK
AROUND YOU! WHERE DO YOU SEE AN NON-HISPANIC IN A JOB? NOT IN THE SERVICE OR
HOSPITALITY SECTORS. NOT IN CONSTRUCTION.
GIVING
ILLEGALS OUR JOBS, EVEN DURING THIS PERIOD OF UNEMPLOYMENT CRISIS IS HOW THEY
BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES.
THE
MEXICAN OCCUPATION OF 40 MILLION ILLEGALS, WHICH NOW IS EXPANDING ACROSS OUR
ENTIRE NATION, KEEPS WAGES DEPRESSED FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR!
YOU
WONDERED WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 AND THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE FIGHTS
AGAINST E-VERIFY, AND ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA?
OBAMA’S
IMPERIAL AMNESTY – THE DEMS’ PROGRAM OF BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY UNTIL THERE
ARE ENOUGH ILLEGAL VOTING THEY WILL HAVE VOTED FOR EVEN MORE LA RAZA IN PUBLIC
OFFICE THAN ARE THERE ALREADY!
VIVA
LA RAZA? PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH! IT’S HERE ALREADY!!!
*
THE REALITY OF OBAMA’S LA RAZA AGENDA:
Illegals Come First – GRINGOS GET THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR THE MEX INVASION,
OCCUPATION, WELFARE STATE and CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
FAIRUS.org
FEDERATION
FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM
FAIR
CHARACTERIZES THE OBAMA, AND LA RAZA DEMS PLAN FOR AMNESTY AS FOLLOWS:
That's
why, throughout 2009 FAIR has been tracking every move the administration and
Congress has made to undermine our immigration laws, reward illegal aliens and
burden taxpayers.
- Foot-dragging
on proven methods of immigration law enforcement including border
structures and E-Verify.
- Appointment
of several illegal alien advocates to important administration posts.
- Watering
down of the 287(g) program to limit local law in their own jurisdictions.
- Health care
reform that mandates a “public option” for newly-arrived legal immigrants
as well as illegal aliens.
FROM
MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES – MOUTHPIECE OF LA RAZA PROPAGANDA and SUPREMACY:
June 16, 2012
For
Many Immigrants, Policy Offers Joy and Relief
By IAN LOVETT
LOS ANGELES — Ana
Sochitl graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, on Saturday,
with a degree in sociology. But until Friday, she had worried that even after
she threw her cap into the air, she would be stuck at her job at a taco shop,
the price of having immigrated here illegally at age 4.
But a day after
President
Obama announced an executive action to permit hundreds of thousands of
young illegal immigrants to remain in this country, Ms. Sochitl said that
instead of a life working at a taco shop, she was going to look for a job that
uses her degree, working in a rehabilitation center.
“Before this, I
wondered what I was going to do with my life,” said Ms. Sochitl, 21. “This is
opening a door for me. Now I can get a job that uses my degree. I can do
something with myself.”
For many
immigrants here, especially students like Ms. Sochitl, Mr. Obama’s announcement
on Friday of his plan to offer work permits to some illegal immigrants under 30
years old who came to the United States before age 16, unleashed a wave of joy
and relief, undercut with wariness about if and how the policy might be
implemented. The policy does not grant any permanent legal status.
At the taco shop
where Ms. Sochitl works in Boyle Heights, a center of Latino culture in Los
Angeles and a home to immigrants from all over the world, everyone knew someone
who stood to benefit from the new policy.
Even patrons who
were already citizens, like MarÃa Cano, who came here from Mexico in 1979,
reacted with emotion as they named cousins or neighbors who might now be able
to stay in the country legally.
“Immigrants have
helped build this society for many, many years, and I think it’s time that we
were recognized and given a chance,” Ms. Cano, 46, said, tearing up as she
spoke. “I know so many people whose parents brought them here illegally, who
went to school and started working here. And now there is finally hope for
them.”
For Ms. Cano,
like many others in this solidly Democratic neighborhood, the new policy
reaffirms her plans to support Mr. Obama in November.
But even in this
area, some other Latinos had grown frustrated with the president, as
immigration reform efforts
stalled in Congress.
Vilma Berrios,
who immigrated from El Salvador in 1975 and is now a citizen, voted for Mr.
Obama in 2008. As she sat in MacArthur Park, another gathering place for
immigrants, she spoke of her conflicted feelings.
She said she did
not support Mr. Obama anymore, because so many people had been deported under
his administration. But she added that if he followed through on the promises
he made Friday, she would vote for him again.
“I have to think
about who I’m going to vote for,” Ms. Berrios, 59, said in Spanish. “If he
completes what he promised today, I will vote for him. It’s very important. But
I want immigration reform that will benefit everyone.”
“It is a game
changer for him,” Ms. Salas said. “It is very motivating. It kind of keeps the
hope people had for this president alive.”
Still, after
years of disappointment in efforts to change immigration laws, some remained skeptical,
reserving their excitement until they saw how the new policy would be
implemented.
“We heard the
news, and it’s great, but it’s just a first step,” said Maxima Guerrero, 22, a
college student who wore a shirt that read, “I Am Undocumented” to a rally in
downtown Los Angeles. “When I see it in action, then I’ll say, ‘This is
fantastic.’ For now, we’re just getting the ball rolling.”
And most
important, Ms. Guerrero said, the new policy did not at all diminish the need
for comprehensive immigration reform — a sentiment that nearly everyone in East
Los Angeles echoed.
José Pérez, 60,
runs the farmers’ market in Boyle Heights with his wife and daughter. On Friday
night at the market, as a singer on stage crooned in Spanish and locals perused
stands selling cherries, tamales and handmade jewelry, Mr. Pérez said he hoped
that eventually, a new immigration policy would offer legal status to everyone
in his community.
“I know so many
people who graduate, and then that’s it; they can’t do nothing,” Mr. Pérez
said. “This is a country of immigrants. Why don’t we help these people who need
to be helped?”
*
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007
Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (
Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief).
Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in
Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who
hire illegal workers shall be repealed. From the date of enactment, the
Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo
it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit.
Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (
Chamber
of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in
against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (
San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).
Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal
Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were
wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts
any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.
Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that
prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation
of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (
Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief,
p. 10). This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s
authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the
battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB
1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (
Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (
Id.).
*
Obama soft on illegals
enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant
workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures
released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and
convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50
percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift
enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at
the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican
who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican
on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the
wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs
that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
(Article)
*
OBAMA PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST IN AS SEC. OF LABOR TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET
OUR JOBS FIRST!
“Labor
Secretary Hilda Solis, a former California congresswoman with close ties to the
influential La Raza movement, announced the “We Can Help” project with great fanfare a few days ago.”
*
THE
OBAMA LA RAZA INFESTED ASSAULT ON LEGALS OF THE STATE of ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF
HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS!
WHY
HASN’T OBAMA BEEN IMPEACHED FOR BEING AN AGENT OF MEXICAN INTERESTS?
OBAMA IGNORES PLEAS
FOR NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS
Lawmakers from states bordering Mexico are ticked off. More
than a year after they asked the White House for National Guard troops to be
deployed there, the Obama administration still has not formally responded.
In March 2009, governors of Texas and Arizona -- along with
many of their states' Capitol Hill legislators -- pleaded with the White House to better secure their citizens and
businesses from the swelling tide of smugglers, illegal immigrants and Mexican
drug-war violence spilling over the border.
Topics: Illegal Immigration, President Obama, request
National Guard troops, border violence, smugglers
May 8, 2010
Scripps Howard News
Sun-Times Media, LLC
The administration promised to study the request and get
back to them.
They didn't, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Arizona Gov. Jan
Brewer say. Last month, Brewer
complained that she had pleaded five times in letters to President Obama for
more federal muscle, to no avail.
The administration says it has not been ignoring the border
problems, noting that there now are airborne drones conducting surveillance
flights; a full complement of 20,000 Border Patrol agents; a 653-mile border
fence in place, and about $70 million sent in law-enforcement aid.
The governors say the border area remains unacceptably
dangerous, citing the March murder of an Arizona rancher and the wounding of an
Arizona deputy this month.
U.S. Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl, both Arizona
Republicans, issued an urgent request
*
OBAMA’S ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS JUSTICE MAY SUE ARIZONA OVER
NEW IMMIGRATION LAW…. Which Only Mirrors EXISTING FEDERAL UNENFORCED LAW!!!
Attorney General Eric Holder says
the Justice Department may sue Arizona over its new immigration law.
Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder said
Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against
Arizona's new immigration law.
"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a
lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet
the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona
law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.
By the CNN Wire Staff
May 9, 2010
The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for
proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion
that the person might be in the country illegally. Arizona lawmakers soon
amended the law so that officers could check a person's status only if the
person had been stopped or arrested for another reason.
Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling, while supporters say it
involves no racial profiling and is needed to crack down on increasing crime
involving illegal immigrants.
In Arizona, the city councils of Tucson and Flagstaff have decided to challenge
the new immigration law in court.
Holder told ABC's "This Week" program
that one concern about the Arizona law is that "you'll end up in a
situation where people are racially profiled, and that could lead to a wedge
drawn between certain communities and law enforcement, which leads to the
problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in
law enforcement, not willing to share information, not willing to be witnesses
where law enforcement needs them."
"I think we could potentially get on a slippery slope where people will be
picked on because of how they look as opposed to what they have done, and that
is, I think, something that we have to try to avoid at all costs," Holder
added.
Holder said comprehensive federal immigration
reform is the best approach for the problem of illegal immigrants crossing U.S.
borders. His stance echoed the approach favored by President Obama, who last
week criticized the Arizona law and said he wants Congress to work on the issue
this year.
Comprehensive immigration reform would include continuing government efforts to
secure borders from illegal immigrants, as well as steps to crack down on
businesses that employ them, Obama said at a Cinco de Mayo celebration at the
White House.
In addition, he said, those living illegally in the United States would have to
pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English and "make themselves
right with the law" before starting the process of gaining U.S.
citizenship.
*
HOW MANY AMERICANS
MURDERED BY ILLEGALS SINCE THIS LOU DOBBS BROADCAST?
PHOENIX ARIZONA – MEXICAN KIDNAPPING
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Since Mexican President Felipe Calderon started his
crackdown on drug cartels and corrupt law enforcement two years ago, more than
4,000 people have been killed. The death toll among law
enforcement has topped 500. Kidnappings
and violence are spreading across the border, and now the AP reports Mexican
cartels have green-lighted hits against targets in the U.S. We’ll talk
to Phoenix police about becoming the kidnapping capital of the nation and the
rapid increase in other crimes linked to Mexico the city is coping with.
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, June 16, 2008
Tonight, we’ll have
all the latest on the devastating floods in the Midwest and all the day’s news
from the campaign trail. The massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce is holding a “North American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for
the United States, Canada and Mexico – which is to say a borderless,
pro-business super-state in which U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved.
Undercover investigators have found incredibly lax security and enforcement at
U.S. border crossings, according to a new report by the Government
Accountability Office. This report comes on the heels of a separate report by
U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security efforts aren’t deterring
illegal entries to the United States.
*
THE FIGURE BELOW IS DATED. CNN
REPORTS THERE ARE MORE THAN A MILLION MEX GANG MEMBERS LOOTING IN OUR BORDERS.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN
KAMALA HARRIS , A LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN
MEXIFORNIA ARE BY MEX GANGS.
THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000
CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO AVOID
PROSECUTION.
YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY, OPEN
BORDERS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country:
That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps.
These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute
drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why
those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced
legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.
*
So, we have
Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making
threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of
course not. Mexico is also SUING
Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Our country is
being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action!
Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened.
Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe
out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
*
EVEN AS THE MEX DRUG CARTELS POUR OVER OUR BORDERS, OBAMA
HAS TAKEN HUNDREDS MORE GUARD OFF SINCE SEPT 2009! AND THE OBAMA DECLARES
“BORDER SECURITY” IS THE HALLMARK OF HIS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!
IN 2012, OBAMA STATIONED 2,500
TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA… YES, AUSTRALIA EVEN HAS HE PROMISES ILLEGALS OPEN BORDERS
WITH NARCOMEX!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol
Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400
agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to
discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America
is headed.
*
ACCORDING TO SENATOR LAMAR SMITH OF
TEXAS, WHEN CHALLENGING SO- CALLED “HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO
CITIZENSHIPS” LA RAZA JANET NAPOLITANO, AS TO WHY OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN TO
NARCOMEX, OBAMA HAS CUT ENFORCEMENT BY MORE THAN 60% IN ALL AREAS.
Obama soft
on illegals enforcement
Arrests of
illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama,
according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative
arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all
fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures
show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from
going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of
Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled
the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House
Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be
cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans
otherwise would hold.
*
THE
OBAMA LEGACY OF DUPLICITY, CORRUPTION, BANKSTER CRIMES, OPEN BORDERS AND
ENDLESS HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
WHILE
BARACK OBAMA GIVES HIMSELF A B+ (HIS BANKSTERS GAVE HIM THE GRADE) JUDICIAL
WATCH’S GRADE IS A BIT MORE REALISTIC:
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
With trillion dollar bailouts, government-run healthcare,
banks and car companies, ACORN corruption, attacks on conservative media, illegal alien amnesty, unprecedented
and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors—this is the
Obama legacy—and we haven't even gotten
through the first year of his presidency!
*
latimes.com
What Arizonas immigration law really
says
It's not about racial profiling;
it's about upholding the law.
Dan
Stein
April
30, 2010
"As
we exercise the right to advocate our views, and as we animate our supporters,
we must all assume responsibility for our words and actions before they enter a
vast echo chamber and reach those both serious and delirious, connected and
unhinged."
Those words were written by former President Clinton in a New York Times op-ed
marking the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing.
While Clinton's finger-wagging was directed at critics of the Obama
administration, his caution against overblown rhetoric might also be heeded by
the vast echo chamber bent on whipping up hysteria in response to a recently
passed Arizona law designed to effectively address illegal immigration.
Arizonans have endured decades of
federal neglect of immigration enforcement. Half of illegal border crossings
now occur in Arizona, and our study found that state taxpayers spend more than
$2 billion a year on education and healthcare for illegal immigrants and their
children. The porous border is virtually a welcome mat for criminal
organizations that run drugs and other contraband through the state.
Kidnappings in Phoenix are at an all-time high, and the killing last month of
rancher Robert Krentz -- police suspect by an illegal immigrant -- is only the
latest graphic example of the impact that rampant illegal immigration has on
ordinary Arizonans.
Faced with an ongoing crisis and little help from Washington, Arizona has been
forced to respond to protect its residents and its financial resources. This
month, the legislature passed and Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1070. Among other
things, this law requires all law enforcement officers in Arizona to act on
reasonable suspicion that an individual is in the country illegally.
The reaction from advocates for illegal immigrants to SB 1070 -- which,
according to opinion polls, is supported by some 70% of Arizonans -- can only
be described as incendiary and irresponsible, not to mention patently
inaccurate. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony invoked images of Nazi Germany
and Soviet totalitarianism. Reform Immigration for America, an umbrella
coalition of pro-amnesty groups, warned ominously that "it's racial
profiling, and it encapsulates the hatred we are fighting." ACORN's Bertha
Lewis declared, "If this bill passes, Arizona is declaring itself an
apartheid state."
SB 1070 is not a mandate for Arizona police to seek out illegal immigrants. It
conforms fully with the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against
unreasonable search and seizure. Under the law, Arizona police are prohibited
from racially profiling or stopping anybody merely because of appearance or
ethnicity. They may inquire about immigration status only if there is
justification for the stop under the Constitution -- such as investigating a
possible crime -- and there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is in
the U.S. illegally.
And what is reasonable suspicion? Reasonable suspicion might include the lack
of any sort of valid U.S. identification documents that police officers
routinely request from anyone who is lawfully stopped. The law expressly states
that race, color or ethnicity does not constitute reasonable suspicion of
illegal presence in the U.S. In reality, SB 1070 does nothing more than require
police in Arizona to protect the citizenry and uphold responsibilities
abrogated by the federal government.
A ruling by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals this year provides firm legal
footing for Arizona's law. In Estrada vs. Rhode Island, the court affirmed that
the failure of an alien to possess alien registration documents represents
probable cause for state or local police to arrest the person for a federal
misdemeanor committed in the officer's presence, or detain that person until
the individual's status can be verified.
Predictably, those who have consistently opposed all efforts to enforce U.S.
immigration laws are resorting to a campaign of lies and distortions to fight
implementation of the law.
SB 1070, plain and simple, will allow police to identify and detain people
because of the laws they violate, not because they happen to meet a particular
racial or ethnic profile. What it demands is that state law enforcement
officers no longer turn a blind eye in situations in which they reasonably
suspect that an individual they have encountered is violating U.S. immigration
laws.
Dan Stein is
president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
*
THE SCARY REALITY OF THE MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY AT WORK!
Arizona Leads the Way Against
Illegal Immigration
Jacob Laksin is
managing editor of Frontpage Magazine. He is co-author, with David Horowitz, of
One-Party Classroom: How Radical Professors at America's Top Colleges
Indoctrinate Students and Undermine Our Democracy. His work has appeared in
the Wall Street Journal, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Weekly Standard, City
Journal, Policy Review, as well as other publications. Email him at
jlaksin@gmail.com.
If you’ve
been following the news from Arizona in recent days, you’ve probably heard that
the state’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, has just signed into law a
“racist” bill that will punish Hispanics, stamp out civil rights, create a
police state – and trample on the Constitution for good measure. You also may
have heard that the Arizona law will “undermine basic notions of fairness,” at
least according to President Obama, who has called the law “misguided” and
ordered the Justice Department to find some way to challenge its standing.
Apocalyptic
rhetoric notwithstanding, the Arizona law is not at all controversial in
substance. All it does is deputize state police to determine whether people are
in the country legally and to question them if there is reasonable suspicion
that they’re not. Of course, that function should properly be handled by the
federal government. But because the government has made so little effort to
enforce immigration laws, border states that bear the brunt of illegal
immigration – an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants call Arizona home – have
been forced to take action on their own terms.
The concept behind the
immigration law is straightforward: If you enforce laws against illegal
immigration, you will have less of it. That was also the idea behind Arizona’s Legal Arizona Workers Act,
which required the state’s employers to verify the immigration status of new
hires using the federal government’s E-Verify program. Businesses eager to
avoid the burdens of verification and pro-illegal immigration groups also
opposed that measure, filing suit to prevent its passage, but emerging evidence
seems to suggest that it had the desired effect: Since being implemented in
January 2008, the LAWA has resulted in a substantial decrease
of illegal immigration.
The
new law seeks to continue that progress. It does so
mostly by making
state crimes what are already federal crimes. For instance, the Arizona law makes it a crime to be in
the country illegally – in other words, it enforces the national law. The
Arizona law also requires police to question people about their immigration
status if they have reasonable cause to suspect that they’re illegal
immigrants. To prevent abuse or racial discrimination, the law also includes
provisions banning racial profiling, and the measure itself has nothing to do
with race or ethnicity, as the bill’s foes claim. Still, given that the
majority of the state’s illegal immigrants are from neighboring Mexico, it is
inevitable that the majority of those targeted by the law will be Hispanic.
That says more about the demographics of illegal immigration than the allegedly
discriminatory agenda of Arizona authorities.
Concerns
about the abuse of civil liberties are similarly overblown. The Arizona law
will require anyone arrested for a crime to have their immigration status
established before their release. In theory, this should already be the law of
the land; but so-called “sanctuary city” laws enacted by cities and
municipalities across the country have prevented police from enforcing
immigration laws. Such laws certainly benefit felons who escape deportation.
How they profit the country at large is less apparent. The Arizona law also
requires residents to carry ID or immigration registration documents at all times.
That too is reasonable. A valid ID is already required to qualify for
government and public assistance programs available to citizens and requiring
one form of valid ID – whether a drivers license a government-issue ID — hardly
marks the onset of Nazi Germany. Indeed, no less than President Obama has
previously expressed support for a national ID card.
While
some have criticized Arizona for taking the initiative against illegal
immigration, it’s hard to find fault with the state’s sense of urgency. Last
month’s murder of Arizona cattle rancher
Rob Krentz was just example of the crime problem that unchecked
illegal immigration has helped create and the problems its poses for American
justice. Although Kentz was known for providing illegals with food and water,
police found tracks at the murder scene leading to the Mexican border. They
made no arrests in the case. In that climate of lawlessness, the state cannot
be blamed for passing a law that may help offer a solution. Moreover, with the
Obama administration and Congressional Democrats threatening to take up
immigration reform – that is, amnesty for the 11-million plus illegal
immigrants in this country unmatched by serious enforcement measures going
forward – states like Arizona are left with a choice of doing something to
combat the problem or leaving it to the federal government to make it worse.
LA RAZA, “THE RACE” – THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA AT
WORK:
If there is an ugly side
revealed by the Arizona law, it is in the extremism of pro-illegal immigration
groups. On Monday, opponents of the Arizona law used refried beans to smear
swastikas on the Arizona state Capitol. Another champion of illegal immigration,
Mexican President Felipe Calderon, made the not-so-veiled threat that Mexican
trade and political relations with Arizona would suffer if it cracked down on
illegals.
WE
ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEM! SAVE NARCOMEX MILLIONS!
Defying
these opponents and braving slander in much of the press coverage, Arizona has
taken the lead in enforcing the country’s immigration laws and protecting the
rights and interests of its citizens. For the Left, the new law makes Arizona a
model of an “
American-style police state.” For those serious about
border security and law enforcement, it makes
*
So, we have
Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making
threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of
course not. Mexico is also SUING
Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Our country is
being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action!
Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened.
Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe
out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
I might be a little slow here, but isn't America a sovereign
nation? Doesn't it have borders and land and citizens? Didn't Americans fight
battles and wars and negotiate land deals to establish this country and set up
a federal government to protect the sovereign nation? Ok, I'm just asking,
because now we have Mexican drug gangs camped out on American soil, and Barack
Obama is doing nothing about it! Isn't protecting the country THE fundamental
function of the president and those in Washington?
Before we get into some details, check out this headline from
FoxNews.com: Mexican Gangs
Maintain Permanent Lookout Bases in Hills of Arizona. Did you read it? Ok...
rest five seconds and read it again. This is completely insane!
Mexican
drug cartels have set up shop on American soil, maintaining lookout bases in
strategic locations in the hills of southern Arizona from which their scouts
can monitor every move made by law enforcement officials, federal agents tell
Fox News.
The scouts are supplied by drivers who bring them food, water, batteries for
radios -- all the items they need to stay in the wilderness for a long time.
"To say that this area is out of control is an understatement," said
an agent who patrols the area and asked not to be named. "We (federal border
agents), as well as the Pima County Sheriff Office and the Bureau of Land
Management, can attest to that."
Not only are the drug and illegal alien traffickers setting up
bases on American soil, they are also issuing threats. As
Joshua Rhett Miller
reports, "Police officers in a small Arizona border city are on
heightened alert following a tip that a Mexican drug cartel will put them in
its crosshairs if they conduct off-duty busts."
The
threat stems from a marijuana seizure made this month by two off-duty police
officers riding on horseback in an unincorporated area east of Nogales, a city
of roughly 20,000, Police Chief Jeffrey Kirkham told FoxNews.com.
"The word was that these particular officers would be targeted if they
were ever in that area again and were not on duty and intercepted any drug
trafficking," Kirkham said. "It said they should look the other
way."
So, we have Mexican
gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making threats
against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of course
not. Mexico is also SUING
Arizona over its new
illegal immigration law.
Mexico
on Tuesday asked a federal court in Arizona to declare the state's new
immigration law unconstitutional, arguing that the country's own interests and
its citizens' rights are at stake.
Lawyers for Mexico on Tuesday submitted a legal brief in support of one of five
lawsuits challenging the law. The law will take effect July 29 unless
implementation is blocked by a court.
Arizona's new law known as SB-1070 "requires police
investigating another incident or crime to ask people about their immigration
status if there's a "reasonable suspicion" they're in the country
illegally. It also makes being in Arizona illegally a misdemeanor, and it
prohibits seeking day-labor work along the state's streets." This law, as
many of you know, is basically a restatement of federal law... a federal law
that the federal government does not enforce. In addition, this law is much
more lax than Mexican immigration law. However, that point seems to be missed
in Mexico's lawsuit.
And the list grows... Mexican gangs controlling parts of the U.S.
and making threats against American cops. In addition, Mexico is suing Arizona
to make sure that the illegal alien "business" keeps right on flowing.
Does it stop there? Unfortunately, yes, because there is NO action being taken
by Obama and his team!
Just watch any interview with a Democrat "strategist"
regarding what's going on in Arizona, and they will pull out their
"comprehensive immigration reform" talking points. Just like Obama is
doing with the Gulf oil spill, they are taking a situation that needs immediate
action and turning it into a call for some left-wing legislation. Our country is being occupied!!!! That
sentence alone should be a ringing call for action! Laws are being broken.
People in Arizona are being killed and threatened. Arizona takes action, and
what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe out the gangs? No, he's
going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
*
Immigration
advocacy groups to challenge Arizona law
By
Jonathan J. Cooper and Paul Davenport
Sunday, April 25, 2010; A08
PHOENIX
-- Arizona's governor is vowing that the state's tough
new law targeting illegal
immigration
will be implemented with no tolerance for racial profiling, but at least two
advocacy groups are preparing legal challenges and Mexico is warning that the
law could affect cross-border relations.
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) on Friday signed into
law a bill that supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with
illegal immigration in Arizona, the nation's busiest gateway for human and drug
smuggling from Mexico and home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.
The
law requires police to question people about their immigration status --
including asking for identification -- if they suspect that someone is in the
country illegally. It has sparked fears among legal immigrants and U.S.
citizens that they will be hassled by police because they look Hispanic.
The
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund said it plans to challenge
the law, which it said "launches Arizona into a spiral of pervasive fear,
community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide
repercussions."
CATHOLIC
AND MEXICAN CHURCHES WERE TOLD BY LA RAZA “THE RACE” NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE
2010 CENSUS TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM KNOW THAT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT’S
PROPAGANDA THAT THERE WERE ONLY 12 MILLION ILLEGALS IS JUST THAT! LA RAZA
FASCIST PROPAGANDA! MOST SOURCES PUT THE NUMBER AT 38 MILLION AND BREEDING LIKE
BUNNIES!
William
Sanchez, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian
Leaders Legal Defense Fund, said his group is preparing a federal lawsuit
against Arizona to stop the law from being applied. The group represents 30,000
evangelical churches nationwide, including 300 Latino pastors in Arizona.
THERE
ARE CALCULATED TO BE 38 MILLION OF THESE “SHOCKED” MEXICAN FLAG WAVERS IN THIS
COUNTRY AND IN OUR JOBS!
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
"Millions
of Latinos around the country are shocked," Sanchez said.
Current
law in Arizona and most other states does not require police to inquire about
immigration status, and many police departments prohibit officers from asking
out of fear of losing immigrants' cooperation in other investigations.
Brewer
ordered the state's law enforcement licensing agency to develop a training
course on how to implement the law without violating civil rights. "We
must enforce the law evenly, and without regard to skin color, accent or social
status," she said. "We must prove the alarmists and the cynics
wrong."
The
measure will take effect in July or August, depending on when the
legislative session ends.
Immigrants
unable to provide documentation of legal presence could be arrested, jailed for
as long as six months and fined $2,500. Legal immigrants will be required to
carry paperwork proving their status.
The
law also allows suits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of
immigration laws and toughens restrictions on hiring illegal immigrants and
knowingly transporting them.
"It's
going to change our lives," said Emilio Almodovar, a 13-year-old U.S.
citizen from Phoenix. "We can't walk to school anymore. We can't be in the
streets anymore without the [police] thinking we're illegal immigrants."
MEXICO
WARNS!!!! FUCK MEXICO! THEY ARE A SHAMELESS DUMPSTER OF A COUNTRY RUN BY DRUG
DEALERS!
ISN’T
IT TIME TO FLIP OFF MEXICO THAT HAS SENT MILLION OF PREGNANT WOMEN OVER OUR
BORDERS TO GET ON GRINGO WELFARE FOR 18 YEARS?!?!
Mexico
warned that the law could affect cross-border relations, with Foreign Secretary
Patricia Espinosa saying her country would have to "consider whether the
cooperation agreements that have been developed with Arizona are viable and
useful." Francisco Loureiro, an immigration activist who runs a shelter in
Nogales, Mexico, called the measure "racist" and said it would lead
to additional police abuses.
HOW
DO THE ONE MILLION MEX GANGS TREAT THEIR VICTIMS? THERE ARE 500 – 1000 MEX GANG
RELATED MURDERS IN LOS ANGELES ALONE! 95% OF ALL ARRESTS FOR MURDER ARE
MEXICANS! THESE COST NEARLY MILLION EACH JUST TO PROSECUTE. ON LOS ANGELES TOP
200 WANTED CRIMINALS, 176 ARE MEXICANS! ON A.G. TOP 10 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN
CA, ALL ARE MEXICANS.
WHY
NOT LET MEXICO PAY FOR THE COST OF THEIR OWN PRISON SYSTEM?
"Police
in Arizona already treat migrants worse than animals," he said.
"There is already a hunt for migrants, and now it will be open season
under the cover of a law." Loureiro said about 250 deported immigrants
have been arriving nightly at his shelter and that most say they were detained
by police.
After
signing the legislation, Brewer said critics were "overreacting" and
vowed not to tolerate racial profiling.
"We
in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," she
said. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a
dangerous and unacceptable situation."
--
Associated Press
*
DOES ANYONE DOUBT THAT IN MEX OCCUPIED GANG AND WELFARE
CAPITAL OF LA RAZA LAND, LOS ANGELES THAT ILLEGALS TAKE PRIORITY? THEY DO IN
JOBS! 47% OF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE FREAKING ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBERS!
Gregory Kane: Do Latinos take priority
over whites in Arizona?
America's open-borders crowd didn't just play the race card in the
nation's latest immigration debate. This bunch whipped out an entire deck.
We have none other than the Revvum Al Sharpton himself -- who no
one has described as "Mr. Racial Harmony" -- weighing in with these
gems.
"The Arizona immigration bill is an affront to the civil
rights of all Americans and an attempt to legalize racial profiling."
That one was from the April 25 edition of the Wall Street Journal.
The following one is from Reuters:
"I am calling for the resignation and removal of Sheriff
[Joe] Arpaio. Harassment based on color is nothing short of racial profiling,
which many of us helped to fight to make against the law."
Sharpton was referring to the sheriff of Maricopa County in
Arizona. What's Arpaio's offense, in the good revvum's view? Why, taking our
nation's immigration laws seriously, of course, and rounding up those who
violate them. Here's more of Sharpton continuing his anti-Arpaio rant, taken
from the Reuters story:
"Arpaio needs to be confronted. He needs to be removed. We
also need to suspend the law that he is using. We must stand with our brown
brothers and sisters."
Sharpton lives nowhere near Arizona. If you're wondering where he
found the chutzpah to dredge up with this "we" stuff, you're not
alone.
Sharpton isn't alone either, not when it comes to making spurious,
knee-jerk charges of racism in the wake of Arizona passing a law that allows
cops to question those legally stopped about their immigration status.
It's high time
somebody pointed out the real racists in this controversy. And yes, that would
be many of those making the charges of racism.
Frankly, I suspect much of the reaction comes from those who are
worried about how their lawns are going to be cut if there's a mass deportation
of illegal immigrants. (A word of advice: cut 'em your darned selves.)
Don't non-Hispanic Arizonans get any consideration? (Actually, I
suspect that many of the reported 70 percent of Arizonans who support the law
are Hispanic, which makes the racism of those screaming racism even more
obvious and egregious.) One of those non-Hispanic Arizonans is a woman named
Elisabeth Grey, who posted this comment in reaction to the Wall Street Journal
story:
"I live in a
Tucson neighborhood that is a major drug corridor. In the last four months
there have been over 24 violent home invasions resulting in a number of deaths.
It's harvest time now for marijuana in Mexico and Central America. We expect
the number of deaths to increase.
"One of the
other tragedies is human trafficking. 'Coyotes' bring vans overfilled with
illegal immigrants across the border, and because the load is more than the
vehicle is designed for, the vehicle will often roll, or go off the road,
killing the innocent people on board."
What Grey is telling us is that, in Arizona, the illegal immigrant
problem is now also a public safety problem. And police are allowed to make
stops -- of people on the street and in vehicles -- when crime reaches an
outrageous level. If those stopped in vehicles don't have proper
identification, then any competent police officer will ask those people a
string of questions to determine who they are.
Here's what the opponents of Arizona's new law are saying, and it's
the most outrageously racist thing of all: Police should be allowed to ask
anyone legally stopped about their identities except Hispanics.
Examiner Columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and
opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the
Sudan.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
From the above blog,
email articles to those concerned about Obama’s endless push for amnesty.
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE and PRISON SYSTEMS!
“Mexico’s government has
provided its nationals with valuable tools to help them cross the border safely
but Dominguez is the first American resident, with a salary provided by U.S.
taxpayers, to openly promote such a gadget. A few years ago Mexican officials
published a 32-page booklet (Guia Del Migrante Mexicano) with safety
tips for border crossers and distributed hand-held satellite devices to ensure
the violators complete their journey safely.”
*
KEEP THIS IN MIND AS YOU WITNESS OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA
HISPANDERING ADMINISTRATION’S ENDLESS ASSAULT ON THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA FOR MORE
“CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS, KNOWN TO HIM AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”.
Gov. Brewer: Most border-crossers are drug
'mules' for Mexican cartels
Expanding on comments made at a candidates' debate, Arizona Gov.
Jan Brewer said today she believes that most illegal immigrants crossing the
border are "mules" carrying drugs for Mexican cartels.
"I believe today, under the circumstances that we're facing,
that the majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of
Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels and they
are bringing drugs in,"
Brewer told the Associated
Press.
"There's strong information to us that they come as illegal
people wanting to come to work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects
of the drug cartel," she said.
During the June 15 Republican debate she said she believed that
most illegal immigrants did not enter the United States for work. She then
associated illegal immigrants with drug smuggling, drop houses, extortion and
other criminal activity, according to AP.
The state law she signed making it a crime to be in Arizona
illegally will take effect next month.
*
AZ Governor: Obama, Calderon Both Want Illegal Immigration to
Continue to Increase Liberal Vote in U.S.
President-elect
Barack Obama meets with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon in Washington. (AP
Photo/Charles Dharapak)
(CNSNews.com) - Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer told CNSNews.com
that she believes neither President Barack Obama of the United States nor
President Felipe Calderon of Mexico wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border
because they hope illegal aliens will increase liberal voters in the
United States.
“I think it’s
just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President Calderon and the
bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want our borders
secure,” Brewer said in a telephone interview today. “I mean, they have made it
very, very clear.”
When asked why
she believed Calderon does not want the U.S.-Mexico border secured, Brewer
said, “I believe that he believes that he is helping out the federal
administration and they are looking at it in a political mode to bring in newly
registered illegal immigrants to register to vote.”
Brewer,
a Republican, also said Calderon “wants those dollars that they are
raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico to push up
his economy.”
Asked whether she
thinks Calderon wants Mexican citizens to vote in U.S. elections after they
have been given an amnesty and have become citizens of the United States or
while they are still illegal aliens, Brewer said: “Probably both.”
Brewer said she
does not believe President Barack Obama wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border
and that he wants both an amnesty for illegal aliens and a continuing flow of
illegal aliens across the border because he believes that will increase the
liberal voting bloc in the United States.
“You think
President Obama would like to amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States
today because, for one thing, he believes they would become liberal voters and
support candidates and politicians who would advance his views of what America
should be?” CNSNews.com asked Brewer.
“I do,” she said.
“And you believe
he would like to continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States,
for among other reasons, to increase the potential voting bloc of people who
would support his agenda?” CNSNews.com asked.
“I do,”said
Brewer.
Here is a partial
transcript of Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R.-Ariz.) conversation with CNSNews.com:
Gov. Jane Brewer: "Every country in the world can secure
their borders. We are the strongest country in the world. And, I mean, if
America can’t secure their borders, who can? And I will note, Terry, that I
think it’s just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President
Calderon and the bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want
our borders secure. I mean, they have made it very, very clear. But they
are building a fence on the southern portion of Mexico to keep the Guatemalans
out."
CNSNews.com Editor
in Chief Terry Jeffrey: "Why do you
believe that President Calderon does not want the U.S. border secure?"
Brewer: "I believe that he believes that he is
helping out the federal administration and they are looking at it in a
political mode to bring in newly registered illegal immigrants to register to
vote."
Jeffrey: "You think that President Calderon of
Mexico wants to import people to the United States—"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "Who will vote in U.S. elections?"
Brewer: "Yes, and he wants those dollars that
they are raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico
to push up his economy."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in
U.S. elections after they have gotten amnesty and become citizens of the United
States or as illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "I didn’t understand your
question."
Jeffrey: "Well, you say that President Calderon
of Mexico would like to import citizens of his country to the United
States—"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "So that they can vote in U.S.
elections?"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in
U.S. elections after they have been given amnesty and become citizens of the
United States or while they are still illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "Probably both."
Jeffrey: "You were secretary of state in Arizona.
You were responsible for the elections in your state were you not?"
Brewer: "Right. And we cracked down big time. We
clamped down big time. We were fighting an organization called ACORN. We
had complaints filed all the time. And it’s an unfortunate situation that we
had to live with. But finally everybody in America got control of that issue.
But the bottom line is they want people registered. They want to influence the
politics in America. We want our border secured. We’re tired of it. We can’t
sustain it. We can’t sustain it with the dollars for their education. We can’t
sustain it for their dollars for their health care. We can’t sustain it for
their incarceration. And the federal government is not doing their job."
Jeffrey: "Governor Brewer, I recently interviewed
Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County, and I asked him what sort of confidence
he had that in the remainder of his term, before his initial term, the term he
has been elected to, expires in 2012, in January 2013, that President Obama
would actually secure the U.S.-Mexico border, and Sheriff Dever said he had no
confidence in that. He did not believe it would happen. Do you "
Brewer: "I am very doubtful of that. It doesn’t
mean we are going to stop."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants to do it?"
Brewer: "No."
Jeffrey: "You do not believe he wants to secure
the border?"
Brewer: "No, I do not believe that he does want
to stop it."
Jeffrey: "Why do you think he wants to keep the
border open?"
Brewer: "For all the reasons we just previously
discussed. I mean, it’s a political situation where they want that voting
bloc, certainly, and foremost. And it’s been videotaped in regards to the
unions that they would be able to get these people to become voters. And
certainly out of the 12 million illegals that are here in regards to amnesty
that would really bolster their voting records, their voters."
Jeffrey: "You think President Obama would like to
amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States today because, for one thing,
he believes they would become liberal voters and support candidates and
politicians who would advance his views of what America should be?"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "And you believe he would like to
continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States, for among reasons,
to increase the potential voting bloc of people who would support his
agenda?"
Brewer:
*
JUDICIAL
WATCH
DHS is OBAMA’S PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP, AMERICAN
JOBS, AND WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY BREEDING.
OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX EVEN
HAS HE HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS OVER
THERE!
DHS Failure
Delays Border Fence Project OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS POLICY WRITTEN
BY MEXICO.
Last
Updated: Fri, 10/22/2010 - 11:25am
In
the Department of Homeland Security’s latest failure to protect the nation, a
costly program to place crucial electronic surveillance systems along the
U.S.-Mexico border is years behind schedule and grossly over budget because the
agency hasn’t adequately managed the contractor doing the work.
As a result, hundreds of
millions of taxpayer dollars will be wasted and the porous southern border will
continue to be vulnerable despite the Obama Administration’s assurances that
it’s as secure as it’s ever been. So far the troubled project, known as
Secure Border Initiative Network, has cost the government
$672 million although it’s nowhere near completion, according to a new
report issued by the investigative arm of Congress (Government
Accountability Office).
Launched
by Homeland Security in 2005, the initiative aims to enhance border security by
designing technological tools that enable Border Patrol agents to detect and
respond to incursions along unmanned stretches of the 2,000-mile Mexican
border. This includes installing unattended ground sensors, radars and cameras.
The so-called virtual fence was supposed to be completed by 2011, but Homeland
Security officials recently pushed the date up to 2014.
That’s
because the agency has failed to properly oversee the project’s prime
contractor, resulting in costly rework, numerous delays and lots of extra money.
In fact Homeland Security officials stood by as the contractor provided
information that was “replete with unexplained anomalies, thus rendering the
data unfit for effective contractor management and oversight,” congressional
investigators found.
The
initiative to erect barriers—both electronic and physical—along the U.S. Mexico
border has been plagued with a multitude of problems since it was implemented
under the George W. Bush Administration. After funding issues got largely
settled, some border mayors in Texas blocked the feds from conducting fence
work on city property, a large Indian tribe (Tohono O’odham) in Arizona refused
to allow a fence to be erected along a vulnerable stretch of border and the
so-called virtual fence project has been delayed several times.
Last
year a separate GAO report revealed that the physical fence is costing U.S.
taxpayers an average of nearly
$4 million
per mile.
The per mile costs vary considerably depending on the type of fencing,
topography, materials, labor costs and the price of land acquisition, but
investigators determined that serious cost overruns have led
to the exorbitant average figure.
*
Miguel Perez
– MEMBER of the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
Phoenix
Civil Rights Examiner
Miguel
Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the
Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son
of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect
the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at mperezlaraza1985@gmail.com.
*
“He has helped hundreds of former
gang members gain long-term employment.”
PUBLISHED IN THE PHOENIX CIVIL RIGHTS EXAMINER
Pablo Cruz named president of Nuestros Reconquistos
Miguel Perez, Phoenix Civil Rights Examiner
November 25, 2011
Phoenix civil rights activist Pablo Cruz is replacing Manuel
Longoria as the President of Nuestros Reconquistos, one of Arizona's most
prominent civil rights groups. Manuel Longoria has accepted a prominent
position for the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Pablo Cruz is a
former gang member and an undocumented immigrant who has gone on to represent
several other former gang members in trying to make their lives better. He
has helped hundreds of former gang members gain long-term employment. "I
don't care who you are--everybody deserves a second chance," Cruz claims.
As the President of
Nuestros Reconquistos, Pablo Cruz plans to help Latinos claim back the
Southwest as part of the Latino homeland of Aztlán. "The movement to
reclaim land stolen from Mexico is almost complete. Latinos will soon be able
to live, work, and dream in a land where no other race is allowed."
Pablo Cruz will speak to Latino groups tomorrow morning at
the Phoenix Public Library. He is expected to announce plans to help Barack
Obama's re-election campaign.
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-phoenix/pablo-cruz-named-president-of-nuestros-reconquistos#ixzz1elFqF3LG
*
Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican
Separatist School
Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican Separatist School Is Academia
Semillas del Pueblo Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries?
(Washington, DC) -- Judicial Watch, the public
interest group that investigates and prosecutes corruption, today announced the
release of a special report, Academia Semillas del Pueblo (Seeds of the People
Academy): Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries with American
Tax Dollars. Judicial Watch’s report includes excerpts of new documents
obtained by Judicial Watch through the California Public Records Act that
highlight the school’s radical agenda. According to the report’s introduction: “Academia
Semillas del Pueblo is not much more than a training ground for the Mexican
reconquista movement, which seeks to conquer the American Southwest – by force
or by ballot box – and return it to Mexico.” Among the highlights of Judicial
Watch’s special report: • Academia is led by Mexican revolutionary radical
Marcos Aguilar, who recently told an interviewer with UCLA’s Teaching to change
L.A.: “We don’t necessarily want to go to White schoolsthe White way, the
American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to
our own destruction.” • Academia offers an 8th grade United States history and
geography class entitled, “A People’s history of Expansion and Conflict – A
thematic survey of American politics, society, culture and political economy;
Emphasis throughout on the nations the U.S. usurped, invaded and dominated;
Connections between historical rise of capitalism and imperialism with modern
political economy and global social relations.” • Academia is funded by the
Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of La Raza.” Moreover,
Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a radical student-run
Chicano organization, while attending UCLA. According to M.E.Ch.A.’s official
statement of principles, “Aztlan (the American southwest) belongs to indigenous
people, who are sovereign and not subject to a foreign cultureWe are a union
of free pueblos forming a bronze Nation.” • According to Academia’s original
charter application, the school targets “communities [that] are highly
self-identified as Latino.” English instruction for Academia’s students does
not begin until the fourth grade. “Marcos Aguilar’s school seems to be
brainwashing school children with Mexican separatist, anti-American, Marxist
propaganda, and getting American taxpayers to pay for it,” said Judicial Watch
President Tom Fitton. “How could the Los Angeles Unified School District agree
to fund this sham of a school with tax dollars?” To read a copy of Judicial
Watch’s new special report, visit www.judicialwatch.org.
*
RABIDLY RACIST MAYOR ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA IS A
MEMBER OF M.E.Ch.A
Academia is funded by
the Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of La Raza.” Moreover,
Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a radical student-run
Chicano organization, while attending UCLA.
*
“Last May, the state defeated
the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.”
Arizona shows pitfalls in Romney’s proposed national E-Verify program
Romney greets supporters in Chandler, Ariz. (Gerald
Herbert/AP)
At
Wednesday night's GOP debate, Mitt Romney called Arizona a "model"
for immigration enforcement, singling out the state's 2007 law mandating that
all employers use the national E-Verify database when hiring workers. He promised to institute a national
E-Verify law if elected. "You do that,
and just as Arizona is finding out, you can stop illegal immigration,"
he said. Last May, the state defeated
the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.
Kansas
Secretary of State Kris Kobach, Romney's adviser on immigration issues, helped
write Arizona's E-Verify law as well as Arizona's 2010 SB1070 law (Support Our
Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act).
At the recent Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington,
Kobach touted what's happened in Arizona as proof that
"self-deportation"—Romney's chosen immigration strategy—is working.
"People started self-deporting by the tens of thousands," after
E-Verify passed, he
said, according to the Hill.
Romney
and Kobach are right that, on at least one level, the law has had a significant
impact in Arizona.
A study
published last year by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that
about 92,000, or 17 percent, of the Hispanic non-citizen population of Arizona
left the state in the year after the state passed E-Verify legislation; most of
those who moved were probably illegal immigrants. (THEY
PROBABLY MOVED TO MEXIFORNIA!) PPI researchers told
Yahoo News that the law—not the recession, or highly-publicized raids targeting
illegal immigrants—was the most likely cause of the exodus.
Yet
while PPI's research helps predict what might happen if an E-Verify system were
implemented nationally, as Romney hopes, it exposes some of the less-desirable
side-effects of the law as well. In
Arizona, the non-citizen Hispanic workers who did stay behind increasingly
shifted into a shadow economy, said Magnus Lofstrom, a co-author of the
study. The self-employment rate among non-citizen Hispanics in Arizona nearly
doubled post-E-Verify, and a higher proportion of people who said they were
self-employed lived in poverty and lacked health insurance.
Lofstrom
told Yahoo News that the informal economy would grow significantly nationwide
if a national E-Verify system were established. While illegal immigrants in Arizona were able to move to other states
to find work, their choices would be significantly limited if E-Verify were
implemented nationally; the only real (and unlikely) option would be to for
undocumented workers to move to another country. In other words, we'd be
much more likely to see an increase in informal employment rather than a
massive movement among illegal immigrants to "self-deport."
(RIDDING OURSELVES OF THE
LA RAZA OCCUPIERS WILL NOT BE EASY. THEY’RE VOTING MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
INTO OFFICE EVERY ELECTION! IT WILL BRING A DECLINE IN THE STAGGERING COST OF
THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE ($600 MILLION PER YEAR IN LA RAZA INFESTED LOS
ANGELES COUNTY ALONE), AND ALSO THE STAGGERING MEXICAN CRIME RATES. ACCORDING
TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS! THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES CA AS THE “MEXICAN GANG
CAPITAL of AMERICA”.)
What
would that mean? An increase in informal employment among the nation's
estimated 11 million illegal immigrants would result in lower tax
revenues--since non-self employed illegal immigrants are more likely to have
taxes withheld from their paychecks--higher poverty levels among illegal
immigrants, and a higher potential for employer abuse, said Lofstrom. (Right
now, America has a
relatively small shadow
economy
compared to other developed countries, like Italy.)
Another
snag with instituting a national E-Verify program is that the current system
cannot detect identity fraud. A 2009 government-commissioned
study found that E-Verify only
flags illegal immigrants half the time, because it can't detect when a worker
is using documents that belong to someone else. (Employers enter in Social
Security or alien registration numbers, birthdates and names of employees into
the database, which figures out whether they match the federal immigration and
Social Security databases.)
To combat
this fraud, Romney has said he supports biometric ID cards for immigrants that
would contain a fingerprint or other identifying device that clears them for
work. Romney hasn't explicitly said that every person in America should
have this card--an
idea that many libertarians
object to.
But without being adopted universally, undocumented people could still use
false documents. (The Romney team had not responded to requests for comment
from Yahoo News by the time this article was published.) Mandatory national ID
cards have played a starring role in failed bipartisan immigration reform proposals
in Congress over the past few years.
In Arizona, there is no
state-wide system to make sure businesses are using E-Verify. Rather,
individual citizens are asked to expose employers that they suspect of hiring
illegal immigrants to their local district attorneys. Yet district attorneys were
not granted the power to subpoena businesses that are suspected of hiring
illegal immigrants, and some DAs have complained that the law is an unfunded
mandate for their offices, according to Judy Gans, immigration policy director
at Arizona University's Udall Center. Only
three businesses were prosecuted under the law in the first three years after
it passed.
But
business owners still worry that E-Verify's high error rate could leave them
open to prosecution. Republicans in Arizona's state Senate are now moving to
change the law at their request. Republican state senator Jerry Lewis, who
defeated anti-illegal immigration hardliner Russell Pearce last year in a
historic recall election, is co-sponsoring a bill with seven other Republican
senators to provide "safe harbor" to businesses that use E-Verify but
still accidentally hire unauthorized workers.
Lewis,
who is backing Romney, told Yahoo News that he is not a fan of Kobach's draft
immigration laws.
"Does
Kobach's presence in Romney's campaign create a difficulty for him? I believe
it does," Lewis said. "I think people want a real solution and I
don't think the legislation that has been drafted by Kobach is a real
solution." Lewis said the immigration laws "polarize people."
Lewis
added that he thinks Romney will eventually agree with him that making all
illegal immigrants leave the country is not a solution to the country's
immigration problems.
"I
think he'll realize that there is a place for a real solution to the issue, and
it's not just let's get everybody that's undocumented out of the country,"
Lewis said.
ARIZONA, UNDER LA RAZA
OCCUPATION, ENDORSES ROMNEY, WHILE THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS STILL STAND BEHIND
THEIR MAN OBAMA!
OBAMA HAS SUED THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE OF AZ ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS
SABOTAGED E-VERIFY IN AZ, AND MADE BORDER SECURITY A JOKE!
NEXT TO MEXICO CITY,
PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEXICAN KIDNAPPING, HOME INVASION, CAR THEFT, AND
GATEWAY FOR THE SOUTHERN INVASION OF THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!
*
PAT
BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
What is the response of
Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully
executed?
He is siding with the
law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a
Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is
commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to
fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com
Whose
Country Is This? THE MEXICANS KNOW WE ARE A LOOTED COLONY OF NARCOMEX!
Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With the support of 70
percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the
border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the
U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states
from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.
"We in Arizona have been
more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer.
"But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable
situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona
because we have a failed state in Washington.
What
is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal
laws are faithfully executed?
He
is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is
not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country
of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of
Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own
dereliction of duty.
He has denounced Arizona as
"misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that
Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has
said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the
costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.
How's that for Andrew
Jackson-style leadership?
Obama has done everything but
his duty to enforce the law.
Undeniably, making it a state
as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally, and requiring
police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a "reasonable
suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome. But what choice did
Arizona have?
The state has a fiscal crisis
caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for
illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in
taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000
troops on the border.
Police officers and a
prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to
be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases
through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.
If Arizona does not get
control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to
Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.
A
country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald
Reagan reminded us.
What we are talking about
here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders
isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
The tasks that Arizonans are
themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and
federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and
Homeland Security.
Arizona has been compelled to
assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their job. And for that
dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the president of the United
States.
Why is Obama paralyzed? Why
does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by punishing the
businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20 million
illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?
*
OBAMA THE HISPANDERING
PRESIDENT SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*
Because he is politically
correct. Because he owes a big debt to the Hispanic lobby that helped deliver
two-thirds of that vote in 2008. Though most citizens of Hispanic descent in
Arizona want the border protected and the laws enforced, the Hispanic lobby
demands that the law be changed.
Fair enough. But the nation
rose up as one to reject the "path-to-citizenship" -- i.e., amnesty
-- that the 2007 plan of George W. Bush, McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama envisioned.
Al Sharpton threatens to go
to Phoenix and march in the streets against the new Arizona law. Let him go.
JOBS? NO LEGAL NEED APPLY
HERE!
Let us see how many
African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million jobs held by
illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children, will march to
defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the heaviest price.
Last year, while Americans
were losing a net of 5 million jobs, the U.S. government -- Bush and Obama both
-- issued 1,131,000 green cards to legal immigrants to come and take the jobs
that did open up, a flood of immigrants equaled in only four other years in our
history.
What are we doing to our own
people?
Whose country is this,
anyway?
America today has an
establishment that, because it does not like the immigration laws, countenances
and condones wholesale violation of those laws.
Nevertheless, under those
laws, the U.S. government is obligated to deport illegal aliens and punish
businesses that knowingly hire them.
This is not an option. It is
an obligation.
Can anyone say Barack Obama
is meeting that obligation?
*
FAIRUS.org
The Administration's Phantom
Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very
little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and
gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the
flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner
as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for
American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet
Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the
Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the
millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.
WILL MEXICO
BANKRUPT AMERICA LIKE IT HAS MEXIFORNIA?
BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN
AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)
Calif.
Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants
July 05, 2011
While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the
U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal
immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal
government.The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical
providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse
them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law
requires facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their
immigration status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually nonexistent,” according to a letter
submitted by the American Hospital Association to the president.This week
officials in California, the state with the largest concentration of illegal
immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation after revealing that
hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal
aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to
California Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.The
problem will only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion
for 2010 could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them
to treat patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they
get stuck with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail
services or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare.Nationwide,
U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free
medical care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest
hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides
the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted
America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language program (Ventanillas de Salud,
Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers its nationals—living
in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers where they can get
free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.
*
Most Illegal
Immigrant Families Collect Welfare
April 05, 2011
Surprise,
surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal
immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their
American-born anchor babies.Even before the recession, immigrant households
with children used welfare programs at consistently higher rates than natives,
according to the extensive census data collected and analyzed by a
nonpartisanWashington D.C. group dedicated to researching legal and illegal
immigration in the U.S. The results, published this month in a lengthy report,
are hardly surprising.Basically, the majority of households across the country
benefitting from publicly-funded welfare programs are headed by immigrants,
both legal and illegal. States where immigrant households with children have
the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%), Texas, California and New York
with 61% each and Pennsylvania(59%).The study focused on eight major welfare
programs that cost the government $517 billion the year they were examined.
They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the disabled, Temporary
Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional program known as Women,
Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced school lunch, public
housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).Food assistance and
Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal immigrants, mainly on
behalf of their American-born children who get automatic citizenship. On the other
hand, legal immigrant households take advantage of every available welfare
program, according to the study, which attributes it to low education level and
resulting low income.The highest rate of welfare recipients come from the
Dominican Republic (82 %), Mexico and Guatemala (75%) and Ecuador (70%),
according to the report, which says welfare use tends to be high for both new
arrivals and established residents.
*
CA
UNDER MEX OCCUPATION OPERATES $16 BILLION IN DEFICITS, WHILE PUTTING OUT $20
BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. THESE ARE STATE COSTS. ADD WHAT THE
COUNTIES ARE FORCED TO PAY OUT AND THEN THE AMOUNT PRIVATE HOSPITALS MUST PAY
FOR MEXICO’S “FREE” MEDICAL ($1.3 BILLION YEARLY!).
WILL
MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA? OR JUST TAKE ALL OUR JOBS?
*
LOS ANGELES ANCHOR BABY WELFARE PROGRAM:
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT
EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL
WATCH)
California
spending annually $22 billion to support illegals
Going To the Top!
By Susan Tully
I've been at the immigration reform and enforcement table for about 20 years.
I've worked with activists during all those years. But last week, in Los
Angeles, I had a first-time-ever experience at an activist brain storming
session.
Gathered for an update on Stop AB131, the petition drive to gather signatures
to force a ballot initiative as to whether the California taxpayers should fund
college grants to illegal aliens, I asked the top activist leaders from
Southern California how the signature drive was going.
They started updating me with the positive response from California residents
who signed the petitions, but then admitted about 500,000 more signatures were
still needed. When I said there was only a little more than three weeks to go
to meet the January 5th deadline, suddenly their faces dropped at once, and the
room went completely silent.
It was easy to read on each of their faces; the task was nearly impossible!
Without big money to pay signature gatherers or a tsunami of petitions flooding
in, the taxpayers of California will be forced to give grant money to illegal
aliens for college, on top of the $22 billion they are spending annually in
California to support the illegal alien population.
While all of our minds were racing and searching for suggestions as to how to
accomplish this daunting task of gathering signatures, Lupe Moreno, long time
Hispanic leader from Santa Ana, said "Can we have a prayer?" Everyone
agreed to pray.
As the prayer went around the table, people expressed their sorrow for the lack
of leadership in the State of California and in the nation to protect the
interest of American citizens, and asked for divine guidance in helping them
understand the harm their policies are inflicting on millions of innocent
people in the state. In all the years I have worked on this issue, I had not
witnessed the sort of sincere emotion that was expressed in that room.
(THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of
LA RAZA! AND WE ARE FORCED TO FUND IT!)
You see, the politicians in California are happy to give money the state
doesn't have to illegal aliens to attend college, while they cut the budgets
and slash programs for public safety, right and left. The American citizen's
interests and safety are simply collateral damage for seeking and appealing to
the illegal alien lobby.
These activists in California have already learned what the rest of the nation
is about to learn. We the people. . . are the only ones looking out for the
best interest of American citizens. With few exceptions, we have no national
leadership on the issue of stopping the illegal migration flow into our nation.
American citizenship or the benefits thereof have become a commodity for
politicians to pander and barter away. They will grant de facto citizenship
through sanctuary policies, in-state tuition, non-compliance with Secure
Communities, grants for college, etc., etc., etc. President Obama and most the
Republican presidential hopefuls are peddling various versions of amnesty
proposals if they are elected next year.
What do these politicians want in return? They are hoping to leverage enough
votes in key states to put them over the top in 2012, no matter what it costs
the American people. This is futures betting: The politicians are gambling the
nation's future in hopes of winning the next election.
So while the state can't afford to pay its bills or provide
decent services to citizens, these California activists watch their elected
leaders lavish still more benefits for people who don't have a legal right to
be in the country. And while their child might have to pay out-of-state tuition
to go to college in another state, thousands of illegal aliens are going to
college at in-state tuition rates in California that they are subsidizing.
In addition they know that millions of other illegal alien parents are
receiving food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance and dozens of other state
and local benefits for their American-born children, while they have to decide
which bills will be paid this month and which will have to wait.
It's not hard to understand why the activist of California need all the help
they can get. Please go to www.stopAB131.com and lend a hand to our friends and
family and the people of California to do what needs to be done for the good of
our children first.
THE
OBAMA CATCH, RELEASE AND REGISTER (ILLEGALS) TO VOTE PROGRAM:
PLEASE EMAIL THIS
BLOG POSTING TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS! YOUR STATE IS NEXT TO FALL TO MEXICO!